Skip to main content

AP ASSEMBLY REJECTED STATE BIFURCATION BILL

In an embarrassment for the Congress, the Andhra Pradesh Legislature today turned down the Centre's proposal to bifurcate the state with both Houses adopting separate resolutions by voice vote rejecting the AP Reorganisation Bill-2013.
Though a "formality" under Article 3 of the Constitution has been completed, it will not have any bearing on the Centre's decision to create a separate state of Telangana by dividing Andhra Pradesh.
On a day marked by high drama in the Legislative Assembly, Speaker Nadendla Manohar put the ‘government resolution' moved by Chief Minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy – rejecting the Bill – for consideration of the House and it was carried by voice vote.
The resolution said: "The House while rejecting the AP Reorganisation Bill, 2013, resolves to request the Honourable President of India not to recommend it for introduction in Parliament as the Bill seeks to bifurcate the state of Andhra Pradesh without any reason\basis and without arriving at a consensus, in utter disregard to the linguistic and cultural homogeneity and economic and administrative viability of both regions.
The Bill also completely ignores the very basis of formation of State of Andhra Pradesh, the first linguistic state created in independent India.
"Since the government resolution was approved, the Speaker said, he saw no reason to take up the ten private resolutions moved by other members on the same subject. "As the time given by the President for the House to debate the Bill is coming to an end today, there is a need to conclude the discussion thereon. The Bill was tabled in the House on December 16 and 86 members participated in the debate. Almost all members expressed their views in writing and they shall form part of the official record," he said.
He said 9,072 proposals for amendments\expression of views on the clauses of the Bill were submitted by members in writing and they too would form part of the official record.
"As agreed to in the Business Advisory Committee meeting, these records will be submitted to the President of India as the views of this House," Manohar said. The rejection of the Bill has come as an embarrassment to the Centre which has decided to table the Telangana Bill in the Parliament session beginning February 5.


Congress downplayed the rejection of the bill, saying it was on "predicted" lines and will not affect the move for carving out a new state. "As far as the resolution is concerned, it does not affect the Constitutional provisions under Article 3 for the creation of a new state in the Indian Union...One should remember this the bill was sent (to Andhra Pradesh Assembly) for comments and not for a vote," AICC general secretary in-charge for Andhra Pradesh Digvijay Singh said in Delhi. In the Legislative Council, Chairman A Chakrapani also put the government resolution moved by Leader of the House C Ramachandraiah, rejecting the AP Reorganisation Bill-2013, to vote and it was carried by voice vote. The Chairman announced that 54 members participated in the discussion on the Bill in the House while almost all members submitted their views in writing. About 1157 amendments\expression of views were also submitted in writing on the various clauses of the Bill. "All these will form part of the official record," he said. Both Houses were adjourned sine die after the government resolutions were carried by voice vote. The AP Reorganisation Bill-2013 that provides for creation of a new state of Telangana was on December 12 referred by the President to the state Legislature under Article 3 of the Constitution for “expressing its views” and initially gave time till January 23 for the process. The Bill was formally tabled in both Houses on December 16 but actual debate could not begin till January 8. The President gave a week’s additional time beyond January 23 for the Legislature to discuss the Bill but in the last four days no debate was possible in the Assembly after the Chief Minister termed the Bill "unconstitutional" and "incomprehensive". As the extended deadline came to an end today, the presiding officers of both Houses rushed through the formalities and fulfilled a constitutional obligation. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BULLION ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS MODI The Bombay Bullion Association Ltd (BBA), the apex body of bullion and jewellery bodies in the country, has announced its support for Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi as BJP's prime ministerial candidate. BBA president Mohit Kamboj along with some others joined BJP in the presence of senior party leader Gopinath Munde here yesterday. BBA had extended its support to Modi as the UPA government had brought about a "policy paralysis" in the economy, Kamboj said. "There are over 50 lakh workers associated with the bullion and gold industry, which has been facing the brunt of the current policies of the UPA government. "We at BBA strongly believe that a Modi-led NDA government would normalise the industry by introducing friendly policies," he added. Members of Bharat Diamond Bourse have said they will host Modi at a function at Bandra-Kurla Complex here on Sept. 30. BJP president Rajnath Singh had last ...

WHY RAHUL SO SARCASTIC...?

Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman today said Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi should come up with "substantive arguments" to criticise the government's Make In India programme rather than ridiculing its logo. "Demagoguery may be good in election campaigns, but when you are in Parliament, we expect you to come up with concrete criticisms for which we will give reply. But to throw something like this may amuse some members, but overall it just projects the leader as not having gone into greater details," she told PTI. She was responding to the remarks of Gandhi who ridiculed the lion logo of Make In India as Narendra Modi's "babbar sher". The Congress VP during a debate in Parliament had made fun of Modi's ambitious 'Make in India' programme, saying Prime Minister has "created a babbar sher' (Asiatic Lion)" in which "clock and wheels are seen moving". Sitharaman said it was saddening that the vice preside...

GARBLED TEXT MESSAGE A SIGN OF STROKE

Difficulty or inability to write a coherent text message, even in people who have no problem speaking, may become a "vital" tool in diagnosing a type of crippling stroke, according to a new research. Scientists at Henry Ford Hospital focused on a 40-year-old man visiting the metro Detroit area on business who showed signs of "dystextia," a recently coined term for incoherent text messaging that can sometimes be confused with autocorrect garble. But in his case, the man saw nothing wrong with the garble. The patient had no problem with a routine bedside test of his language abilities - including fluency of speech, reading, writing, comprehension and other factors. However, when asked to type a simple text message, he not only produced garble, but he was unable to see it as such. Despite showing only slight facial asymmetry and no other symptoms, doctors determined the man had suffered an acute ischemic stroke, in which a clot or other blockage cuts off blood supply t...