Tripling tobacco tax globally would reduce
smoking by a third and prevent 200 million premature deaths from lung
cancer and other diseases this century, researchers, including an
Indian-origin scientist, say. Such a large tax increase would double
the street price of cigarettes in some countries and narrow the price
gap between the cheapest and most expensive cigarettes, which would
encourage people to stop smoking rather than switch to a cheaper brand
and help young not to start, researchers said. This would be especially
effective in low- and middle-income countries, where the cheapest
cigarettes are relatively affordable and where smoking rates continue to
rise, said Dr Prabhat Jha, director of the Centre for Global Health
Research of St Michael's Hospital. But it would also be effective in
rich countries, said Jha, who is also a professor in the Dalla Lana
School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. "A higher tax on
tobacco is the single most effective intervention to lower smoking rates
and to deter future smokers," Jha said. "Worldwide, around a
half-billion children and adults under the age of 35 are already – or
soon will be – smokers and on current patterns few will quit," said
Professor Sir Richard Peto of the University of Oxford, the co-author.
"This study demonstrates that tobacco taxes are a hugely powerful lever
and potentially a triple win – reducing the numbers of people who smoke
and who die from their addiction, reducing premature deaths from smoking
and yet, at the same time, increasing government income," researchers
wrote in the review published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Controlling tobacco marketing is also key to helping people quit
smoking, researchers believe. An independent review in the UK concluded
that plain packaging would reduce the appeal of cigarettes. Australia
changed to plain packaging in 2011, a measure New Zealand plans to
follow, researchers said. Researchers said an average of 10 years of
life is lost from smoking. Many of those killed are still in middle age,
meaning on average they lose about 20 years of life expectancy.
Difficulty or inability to write a coherent text message, even in people who have no problem speaking, may become a "vital" tool in diagnosing a type of crippling stroke, according to a new research. Scientists at Henry Ford Hospital focused on a 40-year-old man visiting the metro Detroit area on business who showed signs of "dystextia," a recently coined term for incoherent text messaging that can sometimes be confused with autocorrect garble. But in his case, the man saw nothing wrong with the garble. The patient had no problem with a routine bedside test of his language abilities - including fluency of speech, reading, writing, comprehension and other factors. However, when asked to type a simple text message, he not only produced garble, but he was unable to see it as such. Despite showing only slight facial asymmetry and no other symptoms, doctors determined the man had suffered an acute ischemic stroke, in which a clot or other blockage cuts off blood supply t...
Comments
Post a Comment